Tags:
it's my website and i'll cry if i want to
my husband saw this
He really used the term "mass purge"! Does Dietrich really see himself as the internet Stalin? Oh...and give me your money for this wonderful site.
I guess we could invite the "unruly" over here.... But then, I can't comment over there because he saw me "lobbing spitwads at the back of [his] head" at the the first RBC....and it really bugged him that I was hanging with Waldopaper.
There are currently 6 users and 74 guests online.
hahahahaha
you guys remember when there were dozens online there at once! and he's purging?
At the same time...Tiedrich is sending out appologies to people he may have forgotton to thank for previous contributions while initializing his 'mass purge' -- which doesn't sound a whole lot different from 'The Final Solution.' Pretty sure Herr Tiedrich is a closet AIPAC'r. I'm sure as long as Obama does what his Zionist masters tell him to do, he's OK in Tiedrich's mind. Bottom line: don't continualy point out Obama's failures or you'll get gassed.
Ah yes....at v.1 the Board Nanny explained that my posts were censored because "Zionism is a code word for Jew used by antisemites"
And, my ultimate offense at v.2 which led directly to my purging was starting a thread about Israel which Tiedrich said was just reposting the same old stuff that "you people" always do. I guess, in a way, he was correct - the Zionists' pattern of behavior his pretty repetitive and, after awhile, it does seem like the same old stuff.
Boy Howdy! When I wrote about him begging to pay him for his "full time job" I hadn't seen this
Damn! (why am I using so many exclamation points!!!!) nothing quite like kicking off a fund-raising drive like mass purges!
I forgot what a complete douchebag that guy is.
His site today has a banner with his fund raiser. An article explaining his decision to start the fund raiser early, an article apologizing for not thanking those who were suckered into paying him in the summer to allow him to be a professional douchebag, an article gloating about being a douchebag who purged his first victim of the season and an article proclaiming that he was going to start acting on his douchebag tendencies.
Yep. Those three articles were an eye-opener. Proof that the dude has some serious psychological issues.
I used to flip the guy a few bucks during his drives, but not anymore.
And here is the follow-through on his efforts at censoring discussion.
On a thread following an article about the Gnostic Gospel and a couple folks commented that SC seemed an odd place for the article to be sited. Smirking Douche comments:
I stopped giving a shit about Queen Teedie a long time ago... and all the "gatekeeper" sites like KlownKarr who think there is still a "government" and that whatever-it-is has anything to with the peasants other than reducing their population.
The duplicity of wahhh-wahhh-gimme-munny... followed by woof-woof-me-boss-own-site... really got old. what was once some good editing is now wasted time... you can get most of this material faster on the original sites... and if you have anything to say... it's easier to put up yer own dam blog... or stop by RBC... started (in part) cos Teedie couldn't handle the truth.
our ol pal click nailed it:
The greatest asshole commenter on this site,
the fool whose asinine purges destroyed the viable community that was Chimp 1.0 and turned it into the cyber ghost town we see today, the cranky, sarcastic motherfucker, childish and petty, the John McCain of website operators–that would be Jeff Tiedrich.
Fucking moron.
Just let your fucking site go dark, Teedie... skip the bullshit rationalization and get a coupla more part-time "jobs." hm- maybe the check from the DLC bounced... who knows... who cares. Bout once a year I am tempted to log once and post exactly the message click did... but he said it better.
Stick a fork in it Teedie. It's done.
© 2024 Created by waldopaper. Powered by
All you good people telling Mark he shouldn't be posting his stuff here, um, that really isn't for you to decide is it?
Put a sock in that kind of talk, maybe?