Life in the Empire
The ten points of the Nuremberg Code
The ten points are, (all from United States National Institutes of Health)
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Heavy shit.
Force, btw can also be something as simple as not allowing a citizen to board an international flight.
STOP THE FORCED FLU VACCINATION LEGALLY PART 1 (of 4)
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Heavy shit.
Force, btw can also be something as simple as not allowing a citizen to board an international flight.
STOP THE FORCED FLU VACCINATION LEGALLY PART 1 (of 4)
Views: 10
-
Comment by curt on July 23, 2009 at 1:23pm
-
CATEGORIES OF PROBABLE AND POTENTIAL IMMUNOTOXIC INJURY& DEATH:
1] PROBABLE ACUTE OR CHRONIC ADJUVANT TOXIN INDUCED NEUROLOGICAL , e.g. MF59 INCLUDING SQUALENE OILS PROVEN TO INDUCE ADJUVANT LUPUS, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TYPE AND OTHER AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES. INDUCTION OF CHRONIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES, VASCULITIS, NEUROPATHY, CELLULAR AND ANTIBODY MEDIATED END ORGAN DAMAGE AND POSSIBLE DEATH ARE WELL KNOW TO BE CAUSED BY TOXIC ADJUVANTS. NEW PROPOSED ADJUVANTS INCLUDE MF59, HEAVY METALS ALUMINUM, MERCURY, PLAMIDS OF RNA OR DNA OF RABIES VIRUS, DRUGS SUCH AS METFORMIN, ETC. TO BE REVIEWED AT DISCOVERY WITH VACCINE MANUFACTURERS FOR HHS.
2] POTENTIALLY HOT BATCHES WITH CONTAMINANT STEALTH PATHOGENS, E.G. MYCOPLASMA, VIRUSES, FUNGI AND ACUTE OR CHRONIC ILLNESS, PLAMIDS CONTAINING RNA AND DNA FRAGMENTS AND GENE CASSETTES.
3] DANGERS OF USE OF RNA AND DNA PLASMA ANTIGENIC AMPLIFICATION IN NEW TEST VACCINES CAN EPIGENETICALLY SWITCH ON GENES CAUSING SERIOUS IMMEDIATE HEALTH DANGERS, ACUTE AND CHRONIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES AND CANCER CELL TRANSFORMATION ONCOGENETIC INDUCTION
4] PROBABLE FASTER A H1N1 VIRAL GENETIC RECOMBINANT SUBSTRAIN CLADES GENERATION, WITH POTENTIALLY HIGHER CASE INFECTIVITY AND CASE FATALITY RATES WITH THE USE OF NEWER RNA VACCINATION TECHNOLOGIES
5] VACCINATION INDUCED DEPRESSION OF IMMUNE PROTECTION AGAINST PRIMARY INFLUENZA INFECTION AND GREATER CASE FREQUENCY AND MORE SERIOUS CASE MOBIDITY AND HIGHER A H1N1 CASE FATALITIES
-
-
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17478173/Injunction2
-
Comment by BO on July 24, 2009 at 2:05am
-
Yep, release a deadly virus and make a ton.
Gonna be a fun winter with at least 5% of the population dying. 'Spose that's what the FEMA exercises are all about. Or financial collapse. Or another 9-11 to energize the peeps.
Good news is...we're all to run down for a cytokine storm to kill us. Gonna be the secondary infection that does us in.
Thanks for the injunction relief document link. Good as having cross with dracula in da house.
-
Comment by waldopaper on July 24, 2009 at 4:54pm
-
DAMNATION dude! As one who takes special pride in creepin' people out... ya blew my ass into the weeds wit a hearty "hi-yo-haw-eat-my-dust-you-fuckers!" And BO... the fekkin Cytokine storm was icing on the shit-cake! GAWD! If I had any kind of "title," I would give it to YOU guys!
Ya fekkin out-creeped da CREEPER!
-
-
I'll be shooting up anything the government has to offer. Probably won't do much though--by the time they get a flu shot out the virus will probably mutate and make it ineffective. Who knows? Enjoy your summer, we can start to worry when the virus comes back in spades this fall. Hey, and we've always got each other.
Here's the best site for information about it.
Comment
About
© 2024 Created by waldopaper.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Reality Based Community to add comments!
Join Reality Based Community